> The evil ones are the ones who happened to be advising the representatives of the taxpayers
The advisors weren't significantly different from the representatives. Does that make the representatives more or less evil than the advisors? Does it matter?
Given that this is how things are going to be if we have this sort of regulation, are we really benefitting from this sort of regulation?
I think that we should always evaluate based on realized benefits and incurred costs, not desired benefits and promised costs. However, our actual policies show that most people disagree with me.
The advisors weren't significantly different from the representatives. Does that make the representatives more or less evil than the advisors? Does it matter?
Given that this is how things are going to be if we have this sort of regulation, are we really benefitting from this sort of regulation?
I think that we should always evaluate based on realized benefits and incurred costs, not desired benefits and promised costs. However, our actual policies show that most people disagree with me.