Is there any reason to expect more from this (non-peer-reviewed) paper than from the hundreds like it that have failed before?
Edit: At least it appears to be by an experienced mathematician and (at first glance) fairly coherent. So it should be possible for other mathematicians to review it for correctness.
It is always hard to check these longish proofs. For this one it takes a bit of digging to find what the proof method is (versus what parts are the survey). The method of this write-up seems to be at the end of section 3 on page 20 where Jin Xu has cut a general graph up into smaller parts (which are claimed to be 4-colorable by induction hypothesis) and then needs to show they can be glued back together without ruining the coloring. Adding to the difficulty is the fact that the 4-color theorem is true- so you can't expect to whip up an over all counter-example. You would have to show some step fails to meet the assumptions of the next step.
Edit: At least it appears to be by an experienced mathematician and (at first glance) fairly coherent. So it should be possible for other mathematicians to review it for correctness.