> but did not seem to consider things like, "What happens when this team moves on".
FTA:
> 3. Cuba itself is extremely easy to work with because it barely does anything. You can read the entire source in 5 minutes and understand it completely. I'm confident future teams could pick it up.
I guess the main concern here wouldn't be Cuba, but the "handpicked solutions for common problems that a web app would face" added by the development team.
> While in this case, we're getting less code in the dependency, I'm highly suspicious of how their working knowledge, method of code organization, etc... can be transferred over time.
FTA:
> 3. Cuba itself is extremely easy to work with because it barely does anything. You can read the entire source in 5 minutes and understand it completely. I'm confident future teams could pick it up.