Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'm sympathetic to the argument (and I enjoy Paul Staments) but this article is a poorly-written regurgitation of Stamets' ideas, which adds little value and makes some overly strong unsourced statements along the way.



Which statements are too strong?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: