Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Neurokernel: Emulating the Fruit Fly Brain (columbia.edu)
46 points by T-A on March 29, 2015 | hide | past | favorite | 8 comments


Quoting from the course front page:

Students with extensive software engineering experience (systems software, parallel programming or computer graphics) are strongly encouraged to apply.

Almost makes me want to go back to grad school. Look at these folks, they made GPU-enabled code available as Python's SciKit[1]

But then I see they're patenting stuff left and right [2] and my enthusiasm for this project dwindles....

[1] http://www.bionet.ee.columbia.edu/code/scikits.cuda

[2] http://www.bionet.ee.columbia.edu/patents/


There is a similar project called OpenWorm, that aims to simulate a nematode completely. It's pretty cool, you should check it out

http://www.openworm.org/


According to the specs a fruit fly is smarter than my mobile.


Based on the current rate of processor development we will probably be able to model a human brain in realtime around 2045 on a supercomputer.

We can model the processing of a human now but it is exceedingly slow, and it is just toy calculations. So even if we can model a mind in 2045 it will may be a long time after that before it can be done in a meaningful way.

In the meantime we will probably be able to model humans in a more simplistic way. Our external interactions are simple. If we can record all interactions of a person over time we can develop a cognitive profile and develop a 'beta' copy of that person. Not a real thinking AI, but to someone interacting with that copy essentially the real thing.

People are working on this topic now but they're a long way away. I'm guessing 2035.


We have trouble accurately modeling how a single protean folds. A cell is vastly more complex. And a brain is far more so.

So, at best we are talking about some model of a human brain at some detail level. IMO, a timescale on it is silly when we don't know how complex the model needs to be to be useful.


They're able to model about a second of brain processing in about an hour now on our largest computers. The challenge of course is the parallel nature of our processing.

Based on current rates of processing growth they can probably model a brain in realtime in 2045.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10567942/Supercomputer...


"with a single second’s worth of activity from just one per cent" So, at some accuracy level they modeled 1% of a brain.

However, while 'the most accurate yet' yet they did not model things like cell death and as ~10,000 neurons die a day it's still an important process even in adult brains. With children it's extremely important as over 1/2 of the brain cells your born with die by 18. Granted on a second by second basis cell death is not that important, but if you want to model a human brain vs say an abstract neural net then accuracy is important.

Sure, other things like cellular energy expenditure, hormones, orientation, gravity, blood flow, oxygen levels, immune response, might not seem important. But, again do you want to model a brain or make a fun simulation.


That's where the 2045 date comes from. That article mentions the 1% issue, and based on that someone came up with the date 2040/2050.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: