Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I find these arguments incredibly short-sighted. A typical American in 1850 could not have conceived of most of the jobs that employed a typical American in 1950. And a typical American in 1950 could not have conceived of most of the jobs that people here on HN hold.

The idea that "this time it's different" seems so vain to me; like somehow NOW we're able to reliably predict the future of society, when we've proved terrible at doing that for thousands of years.

What an amazing coincidence it would be if we all just happen to be alive at the time when all the surprises were over in human society!

The founding premise of the market economy is that we can't predict the future, so we set up systems to be flexible in the face of changing technologies and cultures. Is that really all over now?

That feels like an extraordinary claim, so I'd want to see extraordinary proof, and I'm not seeing it. Employment is actually on the upswing in the U.S. right now, and there are hiring shortages in "jobs of the future" type fields like programming, data analysis, genetic analysis, engineering, etc.

Employment will change, and our training and education systems need to change too. But I think it's way early to declare the end of specialization and employment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: