You're asking down-voters to explain their reasoning.
But you didn't provide yours? Three (two, really) lines.
The first one is .. vague/useless/devoid of content.
The second is a general stab at Microsoft for falling back into old habits of 'knowing it better' (nevermind that this is something I regularly read about Apple or the Gnome project guys..), without any details.
The third line is only added as an edit after people expressed that your comment lacks content, and is asking down-voters for explanations.
Again: You didn't explain your point. I can summarize that post as
sigh M$ suxxorz
and while that might be even more useless/use offensive language for hyperbole, it contains all the facts and pieces of information that you listed in your post.
So what is the real problem? Maybe you have a great point. What isn't answered? What features do you think are useless? What features do you think/know/believe are wanted by users?
But you didn't provide yours? Three (two, really) lines.
The first one is .. vague/useless/devoid of content.
The second is a general stab at Microsoft for falling back into old habits of 'knowing it better' (nevermind that this is something I regularly read about Apple or the Gnome project guys..), without any details.
The third line is only added as an edit after people expressed that your comment lacks content, and is asking down-voters for explanations.
Again: You didn't explain your point. I can summarize that post as
sigh M$ suxxorz
and while that might be even more useless/use offensive language for hyperbole, it contains all the facts and pieces of information that you listed in your post.
So what is the real problem? Maybe you have a great point. What isn't answered? What features do you think are useless? What features do you think/know/believe are wanted by users?