Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No president would be a better alternative than a man who indiscriminately bombs foreign countries, refuses to count civilian deaths, orders hits on US citizens, refuses to prosecute torture but prattles on about fighting extremism while his home town of Chicago has its own home grown black site. So yeah, he's worse than nobody, he's worse than if my dead grandmother were president.


You really think Reagan, McCain or either of the Bush presidents would have been more lenient on him than Obama? (I'm not being pro-Obama, just realistic)


McCain would of at least prosecuted torture, but it seems rather academic to argue which warmonger is the nicest warmonger.


I agree re: McCain on torture. Can you name one political candidate with a chance of being elected that would reasonably go easier on him than Obama?


Elizabeth Warren or Rand Paul might arguably be plausible answers, if all things were equal.

But, they are not remotely equal, because Obama is an outgoing president with no more elections to face. There is virtually no chance that any candidate for president, or president who will be a candidate again, could pardon Snowden.

Snowden is a true American hero, but most Americans don't understand what he did. Most also believe that illegal domestic spying is acceptable if it's "to fight terrorism"[1].

Politically, it would be suicidal to pardon Snowden. Obama doesn't have to worry about that anymore, so Obama is basically Snowden's best and only hope of that happening.

(It still won't happen, though.)

[1]; http://www.people-press.org/2013/06/10/majority-views-nsa-ph...




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: