Well, the Uber site isn't distributing illegal content, so should the Uber site be shutdown or should they just be going after Uber via the courts (where a judge could order Uber to suspend operations)?
I was stating that you could see city government trying to get the Uber site blocked to local ISP customers as a way to side-step the court system.
This sounds like trying to make it illegal for Uber to own a telephone number because they are operating an illegal taxi service. It doesn't make sense. Go after the company in court, don't attempt to find ways around the court system.
I was stating that you could see city government trying to get the Uber site blocked to local ISP customers as a way to side-step the court system.