> In which case you still aren't going to get anything done, but for other reasons (lack of libs, playing with the language instead of doing anything productive, advocating for Lisp instead of doing anything productive, etc).
Curiously, Racket lacks most of these pitfalls, except maybe that the macro system is so good you'll end up toying around with it too much. With some discipline it's essentially the perfect engineer Lisp, though.
Curiously, Racket lacks most of these pitfalls, except maybe that the macro system is so good you'll end up toying around with it too much. With some discipline it's essentially the perfect engineer Lisp, though.