Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not to mention potential misbehavior by rogue elements, even when official policy is innocent. LOVEINT being a recent example in precisely this domain, but instances are manifold.


And LOVEINT resulted in zero people going to prison. It was a blatant abuse of power too.

They violate the rules and nothing happens.


Another important point about LOVEINT in particular is that the known cases were all self-reported. Which speaks to the integrity of those involved compared to hypothetical officers who did the same thing but did not report themselves... but does not speak well of the internal checks in the system, and I have a hard time believing those other officers are entirely hypothetical.


I'm not impressed by the "self-reported" cases.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/08/23/nsa-officers-someti... "Such admissions can arise, for example, when an employee takes a polygraph tests as part of a renewal of a security clearance."

I also want more internal checks than "hoping the bad actors can't fool polygraph examiners".




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: