I enjoy Jason's work (although he is an aquired taste) and think he is very smart, but my completely-legally-untrained intuition is that he is wide open for a law suit.
The distinctions he makes between what he does with his conference and what the people he is attacking at doing may not seem so clear to people in a legal setting.
The distinctions he makes between what he does with his conference and what the people he is attacking at doing may not seem so clear to people in a legal setting.
But my opinion isn't worth much on this one.