Like matteotom (and I'm sure a lot of other readers here), I would very much like to hear what you are referring to when you say "historically proven measures".
You made the assertion that giving disposable income to the EFF "will do nothing in the long-run..." and say we should "enact real change through historically proven measures". Is it unreasonable for us to ask you what you mean by "historically proven measures"?
If you are not willing to answer the question and have further discussion about it, why did you make the comment in the first place? It's a completely reasonable question.
You made the assertion that giving disposable income to the EFF "will do nothing in the long-run..." and say we should "enact real change through historically proven measures". Is it unreasonable for us to ask you what you mean by "historically proven measures"?
If you are not willing to answer the question and have further discussion about it, why did you make the comment in the first place? It's a completely reasonable question.