Peeping into someone's window is bad because it is trespassing and harassment.
Pictures do not passively "leak" online. Someone goes to the trouble of posting them. If that person didn't have permission to do so, they are the guilty party, not some random person who happens to see the picture, not even knowing who that picture is of.
This is the same as if the peeping tom snapped photos, and then shared them. You're not automatically a wrongdoer just because you see such a thing.
Pictures leaked before we had the Internet. Hello? We had scandals revolving around leaked photographs of famous people decades prior. Paparazzi also existed long before the Internet.
So if the victim doesn't know (can't be harassment), it's just trespassing, I.e. As bad as cutting across someone's lawn? I don't think your explanation captures the psychology here.
If anything sexualizing and dehumanizing celebrities is the cultural norm. Which isn't about the Internet per se. How cloud providers can have zero liability though...
Pictures do not passively "leak" online. Someone goes to the trouble of posting them. If that person didn't have permission to do so, they are the guilty party, not some random person who happens to see the picture, not even knowing who that picture is of.
This is the same as if the peeping tom snapped photos, and then shared them. You're not automatically a wrongdoer just because you see such a thing.
Pictures leaked before we had the Internet. Hello? We had scandals revolving around leaked photographs of famous people decades prior. Paparazzi also existed long before the Internet.