To be fair, the article is about Valiant the person almost as much it is about his research, though the title is a bit misleading.
Anyway, I read it a few months back and this is the part that still sticks with me:
Vaillant was asked, "What have you learned from the Grant Study men?" Vaillant’s response: "That the only thing that really matters in life are your relationships to other people."
So do you think it is reasonable to have to read through 4 pages of an article just to find out that isn't really about what the title said? I understand that a lot of people enjoyed the article but does that make this deception excusable?
Anyway, I read it a few months back and this is the part that still sticks with me:
Vaillant was asked, "What have you learned from the Grant Study men?" Vaillant’s response: "That the only thing that really matters in life are your relationships to other people."