That one doesn't require having a policeman behind everyone's back, at best it means that someone is going to be looking at the most blatant instances of "$product is awesome, best $category evah!!!1!!!" posts and calling around to see if the blogger received compensation or product. I'm not sure but I think an FTC investigation has power of subpoena to get at payment records, etc.
So basically, you need to make sure that if you blog about a product or service you received for free; that you disclose the fact that you received it. The fact that it's backed with a very stiff fine somewhat underscores the seriousness with which the FTC views deceptive marketing tactics.
I hope that the people tasked with enforcing this are allowed the discretion to apply their judgment to individual cases. Because I can see this being missaplied, and I can see considerable confusion. And certainly, no one should be on the hook for $11,000 for saying they like their local pizzeria because they once had a coupon for a free pizza. On the other hand someone who is an authority in their field knowingly promoting sub-standard products because they are getting paid should be held to account for their misrepresentations.
So basically, you need to make sure that if you blog about a product or service you received for free; that you disclose the fact that you received it. The fact that it's backed with a very stiff fine somewhat underscores the seriousness with which the FTC views deceptive marketing tactics.
I hope that the people tasked with enforcing this are allowed the discretion to apply their judgment to individual cases. Because I can see this being missaplied, and I can see considerable confusion. And certainly, no one should be on the hook for $11,000 for saying they like their local pizzeria because they once had a coupon for a free pizza. On the other hand someone who is an authority in their field knowingly promoting sub-standard products because they are getting paid should be held to account for their misrepresentations.