The full text of the option that won, since the results mail doesn't include it:
"The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of the vote.
Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required."
The graphical results (rendered from the graphviz at the end of the voting results mail) show the full preferences of the project:
A labeled edge from A to B in that graph means that voters preferred A to B by that margin.
Those results answer several questions, in addition to the clear statement in the GR text above. In particular, it's clear that 1) people consider any result preferable to further discussion (just barely in the case of mandatory support for other init systems), 2) people still consider it desirable to support other init systems, just not mandatory, and 3) people would rather see a definitive statement in favor of systemd dependencies than a definitive statement against them.
That table would be more intelligible if it were triangular, contained the (row, col) difference, and were reordered so that no difference were negative. As it is, the eye is forced to jump back and forth to figure anything out.
However, I think the output as written makes sense to provide the full data; the summaries below that show the deltas for each option, and the graphviz graph seems like the easiest way to see the full preferences.
These are the actual results of the vote; as noted at https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003 , the vote ended at Tuesday, November 18th, 23:59:59 UTC, 2014 (about 80 minutes ago).
"The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of the vote.
Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required."
The graphical results (rendered from the graphviz at the end of the voting results mail) show the full preferences of the project:
https://twitter.com/josh_triplett/status/534870813863051264
A labeled edge from A to B in that graph means that voters preferred A to B by that margin.
Those results answer several questions, in addition to the clear statement in the GR text above. In particular, it's clear that 1) people consider any result preferable to further discussion (just barely in the case of mandatory support for other init systems), 2) people still consider it desirable to support other init systems, just not mandatory, and 3) people would rather see a definitive statement in favor of systemd dependencies than a definitive statement against them.