throwaway77077's post seemed appropriately self-doubtful to me. I'm not walking away from this feeling certain that I should never work with Andrew or Rubicon. But I do value throwaway77077's work in looking into who it might be, and honest representation that it is a guess, backed up by these specific pieces of evidence.
It's exactly what I'd hope for in this case. (Besides Suster just coming out with it, but who likes to look like an a-hole?)
Remember, Andrew can (and hopefully will) come here to defend himself - if he's a VC in SV, he really should have at least one friend who frequents this site and cares enough about him to forward the debate.
I agree with this, but accusing someone when you're not 100% sure and only have circumstantial evidence seems even worse.