Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

nah, the guy is right there's better tech since 2010, just nobody has bothered to swap out the old style DOM stuff for pugixml/rapidxml/vtdxml.

http://pugixml.org/benchmark/

specifically: http://pugixml.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/dom-memory-compar...



I meant "DOM" as in the general "tree in memory" data structure. You did find an implementation that uses about 1/3 the memory of some of the piggier ones, though.


closer to 1/5th.

also, in actual use -> those are peak values, so while libxml will hog the memory until the DOM is freed, the streaming style parsers hold on to the smaller amount of memory for a shorter time.


In the problem above, I did try using the SAX parser that the WebLogic-JVM "factory factory factory" returned, but the element text was about 2 MB, and it wanted to return it in pieces by repeatedly firing the event handler.

Manually finding the index of the open/close elements and doing a substring to get the element text was SO incredibly much faster and smaller, albeit something that only worked for a VERY specific situation.


I wonder why those haven't got traction with things like Mozilla though. Presumably -someone- would at least have looked at them if they're that big a win?




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: