> But still, unless he can explain how he’ll solve this complex political problem that admissions policies are designed to solve, his preening is more of a show and not serious attempt at academic reform.
So from my reading, the arguments against meritocracy in the Ivies are: Naked racism (both negative and positive), greed (although Harvard for example has no need for money these days), and nepotism.
So from my reading, the arguments against meritocracy in the Ivies are: Naked racism (both negative and positive), greed (although Harvard for example has no need for money these days), and nepotism.
Got it.