I don't know if it's satire or not, but if it wasn't meant to be, I didn't pick up on it.
Also, I read this graph, mouth agape, and quit. No, I didn't finish your article.
"Process. It is important not to use Agile methods, as it actually improves quality. While a reader has pointed out that ‘It is perfectly possible to use Agile methods and be a very mediocre organization’, why take the chance? Using a CMM or waterfall approach will ensure that there is sufficient rigidity in process to disallow attempts to achieve a high quality."
If he's serious, that just makes no sense, and would be a miserable, miserable place to work. If it's satire, well, I still wouldn't want to work wherever this guy does.
Also, I read this graph, mouth agape, and quit. No, I didn't finish your article.
"Process. It is important not to use Agile methods, as it actually improves quality. While a reader has pointed out that ‘It is perfectly possible to use Agile methods and be a very mediocre organization’, why take the chance? Using a CMM or waterfall approach will ensure that there is sufficient rigidity in process to disallow attempts to achieve a high quality."
If he's serious, that just makes no sense, and would be a miserable, miserable place to work. If it's satire, well, I still wouldn't want to work wherever this guy does.