Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To be honest, I'm sure that in those cases the camera view would be 'obscured' for a moment so that in a court case it cannot be proved that your boss did indeed use his turn signal.


As a Brooklynite who has been written up for an open-container which was in fact a cup of coffee[0], this is also my first thought. But.. the stats in Rialto are encouraging. It seems as though the presence of the camera has a general effect beyond its use as reference material.[1]

[0] I threw it in a trash can on the corner, officer pulled up 10 feet later, said it was beer, found a beer can in the trash.. Refused to look at the bodega security footage from the place 5 blocks up where I had just bought it)

[1] http://online.wsj.com/articles/what-happens-when-police-offi...


The way to handle that is to stop automatically giving the police officer's statements more weight than the accused. If there was a camera present at the scene and for whatever reason there's no footage to back up the officer's statement, then there should be dismissal due to lack of evidence.


Too many of these and a pattern emergees for that officer


Yes, but innocent until proven guilty and all that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: