Of course, which is why you have the online version [which would also need to be intercepted] and every citizen having a copy of their own votes [if everything is compromised, you can go door to door].
The more parties with a copy of the voting record, the better off we are and the harder fraud is to commit.
I'm just generally amused by the "online voting" issue when, right now, none of us can even prove how we voted...let alone guarantee the vote totals were correct. We take it on faith no one meddles with our paper ballots. Yet, you expect higher protections for a system that naturally lends itself to being as verifiable as the existing system AND providing more methods to verify the validity of every voter's votes.
The more parties with a copy of the voting record, the better off we are and the harder fraud is to commit.
I'm just generally amused by the "online voting" issue when, right now, none of us can even prove how we voted...let alone guarantee the vote totals were correct. We take it on faith no one meddles with our paper ballots. Yet, you expect higher protections for a system that naturally lends itself to being as verifiable as the existing system AND providing more methods to verify the validity of every voter's votes.
We have people like this:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-charged-after-tossing-voter-...
Handling our voting process :/