Am I incorrect to make this truncation? Because it kind of blows my mind.
"a world without [..] pregnancy [..] will for the first time in thousands of years allow us to mate in the way nature intended"
Not too mention that "the first time in thousands of years" implies this situation existed previously, but then didn't for thousands of years... the writer got kind of carried away, that's for sure.
yeah that line sure seems pretty bizarre. The article assumes self determinism for the human race but oh wait, there is this benevolent 'nature' who wants you to have unrestricted sex without all those frustrating side effects.....like pregnancy.
Even though, when people have sex - pregnancy happens... naturally.
"a world without [..] pregnancy [..] will for the first time in thousands of years allow us to mate in the way nature intended"
Not too mention that "the first time in thousands of years" implies this situation existed previously, but then didn't for thousands of years... the writer got kind of carried away, that's for sure.