They aren't the first to learn that they can't keep treating their customers poorly forever. Customers find alternatives. Word gets around.
I have had a Sony TV with a well-known defect that they continued making for years, disregarding consumer complaints. The rear 1/3 of the logic board wasn't supported and the gentlest bump would break it. My very expensive TV broke and they refused to cover it.
Way back when I used to maintain computers, the Sony Vaio laptops constantly had their backlights go out. Several different models. Sometimes the replacements would go out, too.
One time we had tape drives on back order. Some proprietary format that only Sony had at the time. They took so long to deliver them that we found alternatives. When they finally came, months late, they came without cables. It took another several months to get them.
Not to mention the debacle of PSN going down for a month and they wouldn't admit to me that they lost my credit card number. Recently, all of my game saves have been corrupted by their auto upload service.
I have regretted choosing Sony. Every. Single. Time.
20 years ago I was a huge fan of Sony, but that was when the Sony brand meant high quality instead of just a high price.
Right now I like Apple devices for many of the same reasons I used to like Sony (great quality, easy to use, and their products work even better combined). Hopefully Apple can learn from Sony's mistakes.
I don't really know what has happened with Sony. Sometimes it seems like they've just taken a bet, and moved a lot of their QC dollars into R&D & Design (R&D&D ?).
They make interesting products, but durability has been a concern when shopping for Sony products for, what, 15 years now to my memory? Yet my parents own Sony products from the late 80's that are still working to this day.
This has been my experience, too. Right up until a $3500 TV died 18 months after I bought it, with the logic board shorting out (again, another well-known issue with them). At that point, they lost me for (almost) good. I will not "trust" Sony. They have to prove that their products are worth it, and, so far, they aren't.
I haven't bought anything from Sony sine they removed OtherOS from the PS3. That was a huge insult to all the developers who worked at no cost to Sony to make their console versatile and destroyed the business of some of their biggest supporters.
To be fair everyone is being eclipsed by Apple at the moment. The article is right that the CE market (at least for the established product categories) is brutally competitive and the strong yen has been crippling for companies. It looks like it is down by more than 20% against the dollar[0] fairly recently which will give Sony and the others a chance to compete again.
Apple hasn't been the biggest problem for Sony and the Japanese companies it has been the Koreans (Samsung mostly but also LG) who have reached a high quality level, with local affordable labour so that the designers can be close to manufacturing for better production development cooperation. The Won seems to be pegged to the dollar (it looks like it has been allowed to rise 10% recently)[1] so the fall of the Yen could bring the Japanese companies back into the game.
The interesting question is when/whether the Chinese brands will become serious players in the major CE markets such as TV and whether they will replace the Korean brands as the Koreans replaced the Japanese.
I think you're right on. In the home electronics and appliances space, Apple offers very few items. The direct competition now is between Korean and Japanese makers. I've noticed some price creep in Korean goods now that they've elbowed Japanese products largely out of the American market. It almost seem strange these days to see a TV in the U.S. that's not a Samsung or an LG.
I also agree that the Chinese made products may challenge this current status, but Chinese products have very serious quality issues that may turn a purchase into a one-time thing instead of a repeated customer. Samsung is synonymous now with quality products.
It's surprising they haven't made more of a play in the videogame market. Until the Japanese import ban was dropped a few years ago, Samsung licensed, built, marketed and sold Japanese video games under local names like Super Gam*Boy (Genesis/Megadrive) -- Hyundai got the Nintendo Consoles each with similarly different names.
Also, Korea is pushing hard on design right now. The effects are mixed, but they're trying to break out of a pure copy-the-hot-design mentality right now. Chinese manufacturing is still very much in the copy-the-design mode vs. new design. But the effort is there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dongdaemun_Design_Plaza
Japan is still King of design right now among the three countries, able to bring about completely new products from whole-cloth at I think a higher level of quality and finish. But I'd say in 5-10 years the difference between Korean and Japanese output will be negligible.
I don't think the Won is pegged anymore to the dollar (I think that ended in the late 90s), but their largest trading partners either are closely pegged (China) or have very large trade relationships with the U.S. The Won is kind of like the Yen, relatively stable at around 1,000 Won to the Dollar and the Yen tends to be around 100 Yen to the dollar. At least it makes price comparisons easy when traveling!
> I also agree that the Chinese made products may challenge this current status, but Chinese products have very serious quality issues that may turn a purchase into a one-time thing instead of a repeated customer. Samsung is synonymous now with quality products.
People said this about the US when the UK was centre of the industrial world, about Japan when the US was dominant, Korea when Japan was dominant. Looking just at the current state without that history I would agree with you.
The Won peg was just my assumption looking at the price exchange rate chart on Yahoo but maybe it was just a lack of precision, xe.com[0] seems much more accurate and shows a more normal looking graph.
In terms of China becoming the next big "competition" you may well be right. The one thing I would say is that China has such a large and growing internal market that many Chinese manufacturers may see it as being far easier to concentrate on the domestic market which they understand than an international market which they don't. Given that, it might take a lot longer for those Chinese brands to attempt to crack the international markets than you might think.
Yeah, I agree with this as well. I think cars are a useful thing to look at. The Korean market went international relatively quickly once they started making cars because the domestic market is relatively small (even with lots of trade protectionism keeping foreign competitors out). The Chinese market is robust, but pretty much entirely internal at the moment.
Still, the Chinese market has shown that there's lots of talent out there able to build all kinds of things. We'll see how long it takes for the domestic markets to mature enough to put pressure on manufacturers to go global.
Overcoming the public perception of decades (generations even) of exporting essentially crap products will take a while.
All very good points. I suspect that Chinese brands will do to the Japanese what the Japanese did to Americans and Europeans. In some cases, they will take shortcuts to gain brand recognition early (e.g. Lenovo buying IBM's ThinkPad business).
I feel Economist is just bringing Apple into this discussion of the trouble Japanese electronics firms in order to attract more clicks. Apple makes no TV, display panel, fridge, DVD player, or dishwasher.
The real reason the Japanese electronic firms are in trouble is not because of Apple but Samsung/LG. IMO, it's not because Samsung/LG really excelled but because the Japanese firms stumbled/stagnated.
I remember reading last year or so that during a quarter (or was it a year?) Samsung's profit was bigger than the profit of top NINE Japanese electronic firms combined (including Sony). If you knew anything about the bitter history between the 2 nations, it is pretty astounding.
Sony's loss of Vaio is a hard pill to swallow for me, since I basically grew up on Vaio, and may now find myself using Lenovo more since newer Vaios are not quite what they used to be.
Nevertheless I think that Japan's tech industry has a lot of advantages going for it. The corporate culture is conservative, but a side effect is that standards for testing and products released are usually very high. With high-tech manufacturing Japan has a lead over many competitors for developing products that fill high-end niches in the industry. Abe's reforms are favoring Japanese exports, making it easier for international consumers to afford Japanese products.
Maybe Japan's tech industry is "eclipsed," but do not expect it to go away as one of the industry's leaders any time soon.
VAIOs have almost always sucked for me: I remember them as being expensive and polished, but made from custom parts that tended to flake out at the wrong times and not work with Linux. That said, I bought one of the last Sony models: a VAIO Duo 11, and it uses, aside from the Memory Stick® reader, standard Linux-compatible parts, mostly from Intel. It's a nice little machine and seemed to mark an improvement for Sony. Alas.
Sony has been sliding downhill in terms of quality products for quite some time now, in addition to ignoring customer feedback/complaints. In my eyes, this was really only a matter of time. But, by no means do I think Apple is overshadowing the Japanese tech industry; the innovative and creative nature of japanese tech products will continue to progress, while I see Apple beginning to plateau in quality/creativeness after Steve Jobs' passing.
Is it fair to say that all of Sony's greatest hits were hardware based, especially things with moving parts (Walkman etc), and that they aren't so great with Software? These days, when the parts of (say) an android phone can be sourced from a multitude of places, software is the much greater differentiator.
Is there a reason you reposted the entire article? As far as I can tell, it's not behind a paywall (and I'm not logged in). EDIT: never mind, it would appear that some are hitting a paywall. Which is still strange, as I clicked the link straight from HN.
Why do I hit a paywall when I click the link from HN but if I search google for the first paragraph of this comment and click the result I dont hit a paywall?
If the referrer is Google, it won't show a paywall, so that Google will index the entire document. If they don't do that, Google will either only index the beginning of the content, or they'll penalize the site for hiding content that was indexed. If the referrer is HackerNews, they can reliably show a paywall without worrying about taking an SEO hit.
I'm getting strange behaviors. When I access from my current desktop (IE, ugh) the article doesn't even load, but from mobile I can access it via the link just fine.
The economist appears to be following the drug dealer model (the first few hits are free). Once you've read enough over some period of time, they start throwing up a paywall.
They aren't the first to learn that they can't keep treating their customers poorly forever. Customers find alternatives. Word gets around.
I have had a Sony TV with a well-known defect that they continued making for years, disregarding consumer complaints. The rear 1/3 of the logic board wasn't supported and the gentlest bump would break it. My very expensive TV broke and they refused to cover it.
Way back when I used to maintain computers, the Sony Vaio laptops constantly had their backlights go out. Several different models. Sometimes the replacements would go out, too.
One time we had tape drives on back order. Some proprietary format that only Sony had at the time. They took so long to deliver them that we found alternatives. When they finally came, months late, they came without cables. It took another several months to get them.
Not to mention the debacle of PSN going down for a month and they wouldn't admit to me that they lost my credit card number. Recently, all of my game saves have been corrupted by their auto upload service.
I have regretted choosing Sony. Every. Single. Time.