Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you build 'Your question is bad and you are bad for asking it' into your constitution instead of finding a more constructive solution for noise, bad things will happen.

The principle that closing questions avoids arguments is causing serious arguments. :) So - yes, something is broken.

SO needs to decide if it's:

1. A Wiki-like repository of canonical solutions to common coding problems.

2. A mentoring network for professionals.

3. A mentoring and training network for amateurs/students with wildly varying degrees of actual clue and potential clue.

4. A social network for people who like talking about code.

5. A way for coders to advertise their skills to employers.

6. An industry forum for debate about best practices.

At the moment different users are expecting different things from it - which is never going to work, because those goals are mutually exclusive.

SO might be saved if it splits into different sub-forms with explicit cultural differences and user backgrounds.

Also - code academy schools with principles like 'no feigned surprise' and 'don't be a dick' have a lead on this. It's possible SO would have worked better with those principles from the start.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: