So he states that most people would be worse off in 50 years than they were then. This contradicts what Bill Gates said that people are generally better off and extreme poverty is lower now than a generation ago. (Paraphrasing) this article seems to imply that people are worse off and we need equal access in agreement with Asimov, but doesn't outright say this. While I certainly agree we should strive for equal access it seems as though progress has been made in the opposite direction than predicted.
No, that's not at all what he said. He basically said the same thing Bill Gates did, that the poor today are better off than the poor yesterday, but he also said that the gap between the rich and the poor would grow. Which is indisputable and probably his wildest claim, given that up to that point in US history, growing upper-class wealth saw a proportional lower- and middle-class growth as well.
