> I suppose the distinction is in how the police track the victim's phone.
If they're tracking it by scooping up all the cellphone traffic in an area, which they're alleged to have done here, then it triggers the privacy rights of the people who aren't involved and just happen to be in the area, and hence should be done with judicial oversight.
If they're tracking it by scooping up all the cellphone traffic in an area, which they're alleged to have done here, then it triggers the privacy rights of the people who aren't involved and just happen to be in the area, and hence should be done with judicial oversight.