Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The reasoning for not using hi-tech refereeing equipment in football is apparently a desire to keep the game played at the top level the same as that played in streets and fields the world over.

That's already gone with goal line technology. In fact, it was never the case - how many street games/underage kids games even have assistant refs?

> The friction of imperfect decisions is also considered part of the drama of the game, rather than a flaw.

That very much depends on who you ask. Personally, I'd like to see some technology come in (in high profile games played in stadiums already equipped with tv cameras) to help get rid of the more ridiculous refereeing errors.

The most comical example I can think of contrived, convoluted FIFA rules is the Zidane red card in the World Cup final 2006[1]. Allegedly an assistant ref saw Zidane headbutt another player on a tv monitor, then alerted the ref, who red-carded Zidane. Technically the ref didn't follow the rules, as to send someone off the ref or assistants have to have seen the incident in real time. This means the average football fan with only basic knowledge of the rules has a better view of controversial, game changing decisions in high profile games than the ref (fans can watch instant replays in slo mo whereas the ref has to watch at full speed, sometimes with an obstructed view of an incident.)

[1] http://www.football-italia.net/42269/ref-who-saw-zidane-hit-...



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: