also, how do a web site email their customers and issue a recall on their private information that was already illegally shared away?
your analogy is awful.
furthermore, the precedent is already set. just look at the millions of european sites and their cookie warnings... its the same thing. why google should be exempt in this case which is essentially the same thing?
also, how do a web site email their customers and issue a recall on their private information that was already illegally shared away?
your analogy is awful.
furthermore, the precedent is already set. just look at the millions of european sites and their cookie warnings... its the same thing. why google should be exempt in this case which is essentially the same thing?