I actually found the content an interesting look at the things most people don't hear about facebook.
I was expecting stuff like 'the like button', 'successful single sign-on', 'news feed', etc. etc. But this is actually about the back-end systems Facebook had to create in order to support such an incredible system.
I'd like to see a similar right up about Google.
Though if we're doing the obligatory 'first post on HN has to be negative, snarky, I'm too cool for this', then I guess you win. Though a better title would have been 'Technologies that allowed Facebook to take over he web'.
Wasn't meant to be snarky. The title is tiresome. I expect good content from Wired and they deliver, but after all the effort put into the article I hold out hope that writers can construct thoughtful headlines without giving in to the admittedly viral bottom of the barrel.
