Did anyone else find the writing style in this article overly repetitive and awkward?
Somewhat related, I notice a trend where journalists seem to treat Moore's Law as if it were a law in our judicial system, rather than simply an observation that has been clearly stated by someone knowledgeable and prominent in the field and has held true for some time.
Sentences such as "Since that time, his[Moore's] Law has been modified", makes me wonder if the author is envisioning some legislative body voting on a resolution to change the rate at which new transistors shall be added to the next generation of CPUs, or something silly like that.
Somewhat related, I notice a trend where journalists seem to treat Moore's Law as if it were a law in our judicial system, rather than simply an observation that has been clearly stated by someone knowledgeable and prominent in the field and has held true for some time.
Sentences such as "Since that time, his[Moore's] Law has been modified", makes me wonder if the author is envisioning some legislative body voting on a resolution to change the rate at which new transistors shall be added to the next generation of CPUs, or something silly like that.