Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It is sad that an article with actual content towards the end has so much filler to start with. I think this post would be a lot more impactful if it started out as

"Hey, you want to know who else pays bloggers to link to their site? Expedia.com, here is some proof:"

I can understand the author's frustration, and he brings good points to the table, but the first quarter or so of the article is neigh unreadable.




I personally enjoy the 'squeeze page' aesthetic used.


I see no proof or mention of paying bloggers for links.


Do you honestly think they are not paying bloggers? They've paid PLENTY of bloggers. I get these emails all the time.


Why did they do it then? The links weren't topical and they weren't affiliate links. Is it that hard to figure out the motive?

Edit: Are they using http referrers so reward the correct affiliate?


Unlikely and besides it wouldn't even work because they're guest posting on other domains than the one they own or would have registered.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: