The site is basically designed to be a simple medium for reviewing your website statistics. I did start an open beta, but have thus far been unsuccessful in getting any kind of suggestions or improvements that are helpful.
On the front page, I tried to click on the screenshot (the one to the left of "Public Statistics") and was dismayed when I discovered I could not make it bigger.
The copy under "Track Visitors without Javascript" (is that lowercase w correct?) is unprofessional-sounding and unclear: What exactly is the difference in the data I get from non-Javascript users?
Under the "About" link up top, "your sites visitors" should be "your site's visitors".
At the bottom of the "Help" page (which might more accurately be termed "FAQ") is the only mention in the entire site that the service is free, which is something I'd like to have known earlier.
Is "Unique" the best term for one-time visitors? It's usually used to mean the total number of different users on a site.
The signup page is very very slick-- how'd you make it? One thing I'd note is that making the user enter a domain and site at signup is an unnecessary barrier. I entered fake data to get around it because I wasn't ready to commit to anything, but others may not be willing to work around.
Overall, the design of the site is excellent, readable, professional, and pretty. The AJAX stuff works beautifully in Chrome.
I may be taking responsibility for an amateur radio group website soon, and if I do, I'll be using SimpleStats to track my visitors' activity. It looks like just what I need.
I appreciate your feedback. I'll definitely improve the home page, and make the various grammar mistakes that I've made. I did have my doubts about the term "Unique", perhaps simply "New" would be a more accurate label.
1. That screenshot on the homepage should be click to enlarge.
2. The bar wth the home, about, help login etc. should be bumped up in text size by atleast one point.
3. It's nice that you are offering a way to track people who have javascript disabled, but what features/data will I miss when tracking using noscript as against tracking using javascript?
4. The site design is quite clean and to the point. Thats a huge plus for your usability.
5. From looking at the demo account, the stats seem to be quite detailed and informative, and the graphs are also quite clean, in keeping with the overall look of the site. Another plus.
6. Real time stats is a very handy feature.
7. I don't know if it is by design but the whole page seems to jump to the right and back when I click on the buttons on the landing page. It's mildly distracting, so you should look into it. It makes the site appear a bit unprofessional.
Overall, it's a pretty nifty service and I'm quite impressed with it. It has just about everything, I would be looking for in an web analytics tool. Kudos to you.
First off thank you for the suggesions - I'll definately work on the homepage and the font size of the navigation bar at the top.
The non-JavaScript tracker is inserted alongside the JavaScript and is used when a user has JS disabled. Although the data obtained from it isn't as good quality (it lacks a page title and referrer etc) it makes it so you have an accurate representation of hits, and still allows you to see how many unique visits you've gotten.
I'm glad you like the design and actual stats stuff - but I'm not sure what you mean by the page jumping to the right and back. What browser version + OS are you using?
Thanks for the info. As far as I can tell it's because the length of the page gets reduced while the content is loading, removing the vertical scroll bar. Then when the content loads the scroll bar is needed again - so the page jumps to where it was again.
I will try and fix this in the next redesign - perhaps fade out the content and overlay a loading bar while the content is being fetched rather than completely nuking it.
I like the no javascript tracking. Im struggling with Quantserve (to track our iphone app usage) - which, although supports the no javascript tracking, doesn't clearly work.
The site looks neat and simple - the graph is quite nice. Congratulations.
When I click the buttons: * Public Statistics * Per-Visitor Drill Down * Track Multiple Sites * Live Website Stats * Track Visitors without JavaScript - the entire site shakes. I'm using Mozilla Firefox if it's any help.
Thanks! I'm not really concerned about getting the site working for non-Javascript users right now, I'm primarily looking to work on the functionality side of things before I worry about that. :)
The copy under "Track Visitors without Javascript" (is that lowercase w correct?) is unprofessional-sounding and unclear: What exactly is the difference in the data I get from non-Javascript users?
Under the "About" link up top, "your sites visitors" should be "your site's visitors".
At the bottom of the "Help" page (which might more accurately be termed "FAQ") is the only mention in the entire site that the service is free, which is something I'd like to have known earlier.
Is "Unique" the best term for one-time visitors? It's usually used to mean the total number of different users on a site.
The signup page is very very slick-- how'd you make it? One thing I'd note is that making the user enter a domain and site at signup is an unnecessary barrier. I entered fake data to get around it because I wasn't ready to commit to anything, but others may not be willing to work around.
Overall, the design of the site is excellent, readable, professional, and pretty. The AJAX stuff works beautifully in Chrome.
I may be taking responsibility for an amateur radio group website soon, and if I do, I'll be using SimpleStats to track my visitors' activity. It looks like just what I need.