Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That's the catchy title, but the article is really about density and transportation by car. There's a nice diagram describing how living in the suburbs reduces the number of places in walking distance, but in that diagram the house isn't even on a cul-de-sac. The thesis is actually that cul-de-sacs increase driving distance, because the places where they are used tend not to have any walkable destinations.

This makes it possible to actually connect useful mass transit to the suburb, which as the article explained, people will use if it's there.

The article says that people in midtown take MARTA to the grocery store... I can confidently tell you that this is incorrect at best. People in midtown drive their car to Whole Foods on the way back from their 15 minute reverse commute to work in another part of town. They will later walk to a local restaurant, bar, the park, or a local grocery or retail store, but it is rare that they will use MARTA except to get to the airport.




>The thesis is actually that cul-de-sacs increase driving distance, because the places where they are used tend not to have any walkable destinations.

The correlation seems credible, but not the causitive. That is, you probably could build developments where cul-de-sacs are common for streets and where mixed use properties are connected by walking paths.


Which sounds like a pretty nice environment, really!


In Midtown, I walk to Publix (I don't Marta to the grocery and avoid it at after the 7pm switch.

The most likely people to use Marta for groceries are the poor (and assumably carless) particularly from the South of the city (West End). And, I feel like my Publix is the only one located on the line.

I'd add that I ride Marta to get to Lenox, Buckhead, and Braves/Falcons games most often. Friends that live near stations and ride Marta also ride to GT.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: