"Nothing important that wasn't an obvious downfall has happened since then."
I don't know, I had thought that sending human beings to the moon was a step forward.
"Edwardian Science and technology was the last time we actually had real progress in science and technology."
Again, I had thought nanotechnology and computing theory and hundreds of branches of medicine and myriad other fields had been conceived of and advanced in the time since the Edwardian era. But you seem to know best, Lupole Boucher.
"Social welfare programs like the Large Hadron Collider are brobdinagian, billion dollar avoidances of the Basic Question."
This irritates me. Using obscure wording and speaking intentionally over your audience is a tactic used when you're frightened of your arguments (or lack of) being torn apart or exposed. (He didn't even spell "brobdingnagian" correctly, the prick.)
I suppose there is some value to having read that, I can now use it as a cautionary tale and steer my life firmly away from the direction his seems to have taken.
Edwardian Science and technology was the last time we actually had real progress in science and technology...
Is anyone else driven into fits of giggles by the sight of someone typing this phrase into the Internet?
Meanwhile, Wolfram Alpha continues to please. Google tells me that if you type the phrase "life expectancy France 1910" into Wolfram Alpha the number "51.37 years" comes out. 17.3% of French children born in 1910 failed to live beyond age ten! Someone should go back in time and explain to these kids, and their mothers, how great it is to live in a "high civilization".
(For the curious: The life expectancy number for the UK was 54 years in 1910. Alpha doesn't seem to return a contemporary result for the USA: it keeps giving me 1933 numbers, by which time US life expectancy was 61 years and the death rate by age 10 was only 8.4% in the USA. Modern numbers: France in 2006: 81 years, 0.48% dead by age 10; USA in 2005: 78 years, 0.87% dead by age 10.)
A fine example of how history compresses, sanitizes and romanticizes the past. Why in my day, "prices were reasonable, politicians were noble and children respected their elders."
Reading through the comments, the guys sort of sounds like a douche. Stating things like "women don't contribute to anything of lasting cultural value." Well OF COURSE they didn't. It wasn't until 1920 that women were allowed to vote (at least in the USA), and it hasn't been until recently that women have made headway in holding political/powerful positions. If you take a look at that era, you'll find that racism and sexism abounded, and I'll bet they also believed that the Muslims were 'savages' because they didn't believe in the 'one true god.' Sounds like a perfect and enlightened civilization to me...
The comments section is just bunch of "I was born in the wrong era" morons circle jerking their "my era can beat up your era" ideas. And almost everything that they talk about is subjective... like taste in music. The author admits his likes to jam to the 1920's Radio Network while coding, only to decry all the newer music as garbage.
"It was the apex of European civilization in the same sense that the era of Pericles was the apex of Ancient Greek civilization."
Curiously enough, this is literally true, in the sense that this was when the US surpassed Britain as the leading economic power. It would have happened regardless of WW I though.
When people refer to European civilization, they are usually including USA/Canada in there as they are part of the 'Western World.' It would probably do people well to specify 'European Civilization' or 'European-based Civilization' I guess.
There is a term, Anglosphere, which encompasses UK, USA, Canada, NZ, Australia. It's useful to recognize the Anglosphere as a distinct subset of The West - not least because Russia is effectively Western now.
I don't know, I had thought that sending human beings to the moon was a step forward.
"Edwardian Science and technology was the last time we actually had real progress in science and technology."
Again, I had thought nanotechnology and computing theory and hundreds of branches of medicine and myriad other fields had been conceived of and advanced in the time since the Edwardian era. But you seem to know best, Lupole Boucher.
"Social welfare programs like the Large Hadron Collider are brobdinagian, billion dollar avoidances of the Basic Question."
This irritates me. Using obscure wording and speaking intentionally over your audience is a tactic used when you're frightened of your arguments (or lack of) being torn apart or exposed. (He didn't even spell "brobdingnagian" correctly, the prick.)
I suppose there is some value to having read that, I can now use it as a cautionary tale and steer my life firmly away from the direction his seems to have taken.