Outsourcing isn't relevant. The issue is that Google use such methods to put a public friendly face on their service, while providing the NSA direct access to all their data.
What should be on the Google homepage:
_____Search
An apology for the recent revelations
How we plan to regain your trust
Google does not "provide" NSA direct access, the NSA cut into the dark fiber they run underground between their data centers without Google's knowledge.
A just created drive-by account doesn't inspire confidence that you have contrary evidence.
>Google does not "provide" NSA direct access, the NSA cut into the dark fiber they run underground between their data centers without Google's knowledge.
Where does it say in the leaks that Google was providing the access?
That the NSA had access wasn't because Google was providing it. The NSA got access through some shady practices. They have access to all the files when the NSA can listen in on all the traffic. Not because Google gave them permission.
Very irritating when you claim something with a source when the source counters your own point:
> "If they are doing this, they are doing it without our knowledge," one said.
It's totally relevant. You implied that Google is wasting their time with doodles rather than these privacy issues. If they're not creating said doodles themselves, then they're not wasting their time.
You literally created your account 12 minutes ago just to bash Google?
Yes, I read your comment properly. And yes, the longevity of your account matters if you're just giving us the usual tin foil hat spew.
As cromwellian also said, Google didn't provide direct access, the NSA cut the fiber. Sure, Google aren't the best company and have had their privacy issues before, but the Government is much worse.
What should be on the Google homepage:
_____Search
An apology for the recent revelations How we plan to regain your trust