You want to borrow bit coins so that you can improve your business and then pay back the coins with increased profits due to the improvements. Isn't that obvious? I'm not interested in dollars because I don't think they are particularly useful. I convert all my dollars to bit coins whenever I can. Look at the price of bit coin in dollar terms and you'll see everyone else is doing the same thing.
Do you think the API for borrowing a deflationary currency should have a different API than an inflationary one?
> You want to borrow bit coins so that you can improve your business and then pay back the coins with increased profits due to the improvements.
That doesn't really answer the question. Grandparent wasn't asking "Why would you want to borrow BTC?". It was asking, "Why would you want to borrow in a deflationary currency such as BTC rather than a traditional, inflationary currency?"
As others have pointed out, the most obvious practical reason why a borrower might specifically desire a BTC-denominated loan is in order to short sell Bitcoin. For something like a business loan, it seems intuitive that choosing BTC over a traditional currency would accomplish little aside from maximizing the interest rate on your loan (in real terms). Admittedly there may be plenty of unwary buyers who'll happily enter into a loan like that without doing any math first - the entire payday/title loan industry is built on this fact - but an operation relying on that unfortunate fact doesn't jibe too well with the stated goal of behaving more ethically than the existing financial establishment. So hopefully there's something else to it?
Your conversion makes sense (USD -> BTC) so long as both mantain the
current trend (BTC increasing in value wrt USD). Why? It's like
investing in a stock or commodity that's increasing. I invested extra
cash in a few stocks, including TSLA, while it was on the rise. This
gave me a better ROI than holding USD or investing it in a CD or other
low interest rate account.
But as a borrower, deflation blows. If I borrow 100 BTC and the terms
of the loan are that I have to pay back 100 BTC + 10 BTC as interest,
but the value of BTC has increased by another 10% I'm really paying
21% interest on the loan.
But as a borrower, inflation rocks. If I borrow 100 USD and the terms
of the loan are that I have to pay back 100 USD + 10 USD as interest,
but the value of USD has decreased by 10% I'm really paying 0%
interest on the loan (actually, I might be able to beat inflation and
come out ahead).
This goes back to what I mentioned in another thread [1] about buying
and selling in either type of currency.
Let me hand wave some things, we'll assume that the real value of an
item or ROI is static, and only the nominal value is changing with
inflation or deflation.
Inflation: I borrow money to buy an item. I pay interest on the loan,
and gain the benefit of having the item today rather than a year later
when I would have saved up the cash. Over that year I pay off the
loan, but with inflation I may get a discount of sorts on the item. If
inflation is 10%, the nominal value is 10% higher the next year. If
the interest payment is less than 10% I've saved money. If it's more
than 10%, hopefully there was a profit in having the item now rather
than later or I lost money.
Deflation: I borrow money to buy an item. I pay interest on the loan,
and gain the benefit of having the item today rather than a year later
when I would have saved up the cash. Over that year I pay off the
loan, but with deflation I have an added cost. If deflation is 10%,
the nominal value is 10% lower the next year. If the interest payment
is negative ~10%, I've saved money. If it's higher, then hopefully
there was a profit in having the item now rather than later or I lost
money.
In fact, that matrix is essentially the same. Borrowers win in
inflation (or might), while lenders might lose (but it beats leaving
the cash under the mattress where it will lose value). Borrowers lose
in deflation in most circumstances, while lenders win as long as
borrowers don't default too often. Lenders under deflation
have to be confident that the expected ROI of their loans will beat
the deflation rate, or they might as well leave the cash
alone. Lenders under inflation are virtually guaranteed that
reasonable loan practices (subprime mortgages being an example of
unreasonable loan practices) will be better than sitting on the
cash if the economy is otherwise stable.
Do you think the API for borrowing a deflationary currency should have a different API than an inflationary one?