> Angular is not something to just replace a few small bindings in a your page while you do the rest of the stuff in 2005 way.
If we're talking about the jQuery way, let's at least say "2006", since that's when it was released, though it arguably didn't become "the" way for another few years afterwards. The big news in 2005/2006 was still Prototype.js.
> most of them are badly coded rubbish compared to what you're supposed to write in Angular style.
Or we don't have the benefit of 5 years of hindsight about what's problematic (or, "rubbish", if you will) when it comes to Angular style.
If we're talking about the jQuery way, let's at least say "2006", since that's when it was released, though it arguably didn't become "the" way for another few years afterwards. The big news in 2005/2006 was still Prototype.js.
> most of them are badly coded rubbish compared to what you're supposed to write in Angular style.
Or we don't have the benefit of 5 years of hindsight about what's problematic (or, "rubbish", if you will) when it comes to Angular style.