Which is great if you don't consider overpopulation a problem. It's good to try and ensure a high standard of living and economic comfort, but that doesn't happen in a vacuum: If your solution encourages procreation, it's important to review that not just in terms of problems it might solve but also those it might create or exacerbate (as well as results that may not be so clearly positive or negative but will introduce further change).
Indeed. I haven't see mincome in (usually religious) cultures that promote massive reproduction (6+ children surviving to adulthood).
In the long run, birh control must be a key component of mincome. This aspect makes people squeamish, sadly for the wrong reasons.
