Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The question should be about biology, not stuff like gender. Biology solves this problem (most of the time)



Not really. The stats have not been thoroughly calculated (to my knowledge) but here is an attempt: http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency

Not XX and not XY: one in 1,666 births

Klinefelter XXY: one in 1,000 births

There are other relevant cases, not necessarily measured here, like mosaicisms and chimerism.

"Do you self-identify as female?" is a more answerable question.


but doesn't 1:1666 mean the success rate is more than 99%?

Asking about the posession of an XX chromosome should separate the people almost 50:50, the rest is something else.

On the other hand, maybe there are just <1% people who don't identify them self with being male or female, so the questions would make no difference...


| On the other hand, maybe there are just <1% people who don't identify them self with being male or female.

Huzzah for logic. But note that the question was, "Do you have 1 apple" and not, "Choose a statement: 'I have 1 apple', 'I have 2 apples'"


True story, but "Do you have XX-Chromosomes?" would do the trick and cut the mass of people at around 50%.


All that matters is that the answer stays consistent for purposes of the 33 questions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: