Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I feel sorry for Samsung. I don't know how anyone can buy an Apple product without feeling ashamed anymore.

Yes, Samsung made products that looked kind of similar to Apple ones. Big whoop. Competition over litigation, I say.



I feel sorry for Samsung's competitors. And that includes all the other industries Samsung executes the same "innovation by duplication" approach.

Not everyone Samsung copies is a huge multinational:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24023430


@dba7dba You are hellbanned. This means that most users cannot read your comments.


Just for fair argument sake, Apple copies too.


I don't feel ashamed at all. The iPhone is literally a better and more pleasant phone to use/develop for in my opinion. That's why I buy it, and probably will continue to buy it.

A lot of companies sue over dumb shit - Samsung included. That's the nature of the corporate battleground. I really don't care as long as they aren't suing end users for things that I do with a phone (which includes pretty much every thing you can do with a phone).


You obviously haven't read the Galaxy S1 design docs then.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/102317767/Samsung-Relative-Evaluat...


I just don't see what's wrong with it. Evaluating a competitor's product and improving on/comparing with your own is what any company should be doing... Especially since a lot of the comparisons are pretty much statements of the obvious, too.

I'd bet Samsung didn't really have a well developed UX design group behind their software/UI initially. Then they were brought to their senses by a competitor and did a thorough analysis and comparison to improve their products and compete. I just can't see what's wrong with that.


You have to be careful when evaluating your product vs a competitor, when you're talking about HCI - especially when you know that your competitor (Apple) has sued over look and feel before.

I'd bet that had Samsung done an analysis of the iPhone that was evaluating the first-principles and then had a separate team work from those first-principles to design a clean UI they would have been much better off. Really though, having emails and presentations that say "we need to make our phone more like the iPhone" is pretty damning. It seems like they've done a better job recently when they just go and do their own thing.


Serious question... Is it not a normal thing to hardcore analyze your offerings against your competitors?

And if so is it a bad faith to do these types of analysis inside your company on your products since it exposes you in court?

How has the auto industry get getting along so long without suing each other into the ground?


>Serious question... Is it not a normal thing to hardcore analyze your offerings against your competitors?

Yes, but not to this level. This is a guide book to imitating another platform.

>And if so is it a bad faith to do these types of analysis inside your company on your products since it exposes you in court?

No. I'd suggest that Samsung did go over the top with this.

>How has the auto industry get getting along so long without suing each other into the ground?

They haven't. The automotive industry is extremely litigious, it just doesn't get page views, dead-tree or internet.


I'm glad that the laws reward those who invest time and money to be first to market with new ideas. These laws also force the competition to not merely copy, but to actually compete with new ideas.


You feel "sorry" for a multi-billion dollar family owned conglomerate that's existed since 1938?

Though I don't believe anything "intellectual" should be property, I buy products because they are good, period. As long as Apple continues to make better products, I'll continue to buy them without any sense of shame whatsoever.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: