Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thanks, that comment looks much less fishy than the original article. I wonder whether the Washington Post authors tried to run their test on past known rigged and non-rigged elections. If not, that would be a good idea.


Why does it look less fishy - because it contains charts? Or strange words like "chi-squared" that signify a high level of competence?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: