Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There was a long discussion about this ~2 months ago. Most of this wording is necessary for them to do business, if overly formal legalese.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6347673



Well, not in the slightest. Let's try:

"a non-exclusive worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, transferable license to utilize all copyright rights now in existence or that may arise in the future with respect to your User Content, in any medium that now exists or may arise in the future, as well as to do anything else that is reasonably appropriate to our Service and its use of your User Content (including, but not limited to, use of your name in association with your User Content to identify you as the contributor)."

With this license, Medium can bind all your blog posts into a dead-tree book, put your name on the cover in giant font, sell it in Barnes and Noble, and give you not one cent for it.

Now let me edit this a bit...

"You give Medium a non-exclusive copyright license to display your content worldwide."


Thanks for the link. The issue is discussed repeatedly in that thread, and according to some posters the "license" they want is needed to show the content on their site in the first place. Interesting.

Still. The company that manages my server has no terms like that. It's all my responsibility, to roam all of freedom-land until I'd reach a border called the Law, with no lecturing on rules in-between (if you read around the terms & service page)!


Your VPS provider is operating according to common-carrier provisions. It's a bit like the postal system, or safety-deposit boxes--since you manage the software, and they only handle things as raw disk blocks/IP packets and below, they don't need a license to them.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: