Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I should imagine the "scary" part for security services is the fact that it's printed in plastic and therefore much harder to detect, not that it's home-made.



Nothing stops you from milling and turning plastic. Not only that, there are many heat resistant plastics on the market that are far stronger than some poorly bonded ABS.


I may be wrong here, but don't 3d printed guns still need a metal firing assembly to work? Would that be enough to detect?


The Liberator derringer[1] which caused such a fuss a few months ago only needed a nail, which wouldn't be detected under most circumstances. I imagine that using an epoxy pin would probably be suitable given the gun's other single-fire characteristics.

[1] It's single shot, uses a low-powered cartridge, and is a bitch to reload; calling it a handgun is an extreme stretch.


They put in a metal firing pin because 100% plastic guns are illegal in the US. It was technically capable of being completely plastic.

But like the other poster said, it's a one-shot pistol with a weak cartridge. It's a long way from a practical firearm that will survive more than 10 shots.


No one should be alarmed by a non-metal firearm until someone figures out how to make plastic bullets.



You make a good point with flare guns, but I wouldn't be terribly afraid of them. Maybe someone on a plane could cause a lot of panic with flare gun but that's not much different that causing a fire with other means. You might be able to kill someone with the initial shot, but that's it.

In a shotgun shell, the pellets (or slug) and primer section are still metal. You couldn't smuggle a shotgun shell through a metal detector any more than you could smuggle a regular bullet through.


The shot, however, is not plastic.


Loaded full of metal pellets.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: