Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Read the article again. That's not the Forum, that's the VTM Group, which handles their marketing and legal concerns. The USB Implementers Forum itself didn't make a statement.



  This idea did not sit well with VTM Group, the people serving as the 
  management, PR, legal, and membership and licensing department of the 
  USB Implementers Forum
The hands, the mouth and collector of thoughts cannot be separated from a thing and still be called a whole. Besides even the title says, "USB Implementers Forum Says No to Open Source"


> The hands, the mouth and collector of thoughts cannot be separated from a thing and still be called a whole.

I don't know about that. Publishing houses are certainly separate from authors, and record labels from musicians.


The article is a second-hand source; the author could be trying to stir something up, or maybe just got a bit too excited. Who knows? The article also says the proposal, among others, "haven’t hit the desk of anyone at the USB Implementers Forum, the people who are actually in charge of designating USB VIDs and PIDs". Doesn't sound like the forum said no to me.


What is with this bizarre argument that paid legal representation doesn't legally represent their client? By definition, unless the USB Forum directs the VTM Group to retract the C&D, it represents the Forum's position.


As far as I can understand, as with every organization in the world, when the-entity-that-represents-the-marketing-and-legal-concerns of that organization writes a cease and desist, it kind of comes from that organization. The USB IF itself didn't make a statement because they don't make statements on these matters; that's why they hired VTM Group for.

Don't underestimate the USB Implementers Forum. Despite its name, it is not an organization of USB users (big and small). They have a direct interest in this matter because:

a) Like every organization, they need to have some source of income. Technically, they're a non-profit organization, but they're also the one who issue the VID, and a company giving out PIDs to whoever wants them is eating their "lack of profit".

b) Its members who have an interest in consumer devices/end products (i.e. companies that don't sell chips, but devices using chips) tend to be large and slow-moving. The Kickstarter crowd is pecking at their business options. (True story).


It's signed "Executive Director"; regardless of their internal organisation, it's a statement from USB-IF.


That's a ridiculous distinction. If you hire someone to represent you, you are responsible for their words and actions on your behalf.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: