Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I guess the single-member district system leads to your two-party system. If you had voting districts large enough to choose e.g. 10 or 20 representatives, then even parties with only 10% or 5% support in the population would get their representatives elected. And you'd have a multi-party congress.

Look at how political parties come and go in some European countries (not the UK, though). Not instantly, but in a 20 year time scale or so, the situation can change quite a lot in these countries.



No, districts don't create the two-party system (or at least not alone); plurality (first-past-the-post) voting does: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law


Aren't single-member district system and first-past-the-post the very same thing?


Not at all. You can have a single-member district system using a different voting system, most of which are better than plurality (first-past-the-post). And you can have a multi-member district system using the multi-winner equivalent of first-past-the-post (effectively first-N-past-the-post), rather than some better system.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: