I don't believe a single stated "No" in the FAQ will be very meaningful, except to point out that even the creators of the license failed to notice the loophole.
Edit: Also, the fact that the interpretation can exist and is in written form is what suddenly makes it an issue, at the very least for anyone going forward. (IANAL)
Edit: Also, the fact that the interpretation can exist and is in written form is what suddenly makes it an issue, at the very least for anyone going forward. (IANAL)