Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That fallacy is debunked by every sports car ever.


Sports cars have always made sacrifices in this regard. The first being simply that real sports cars are half the size of a modern saloon, which gives much less room for crumpling.


The fallacious argument is newer/more expensive = more secure. Every car has compromises.


Newer, heavier and far more expensive, and of course even that doesn't guarantee good safety ratings, it just makes it a lot easier to achieve.


I'd gladly go up against every sports car that the Tesla beats off the line and the quarter mile. Which is quite a few.


Err... what? If what you are trying to say, in the most roundabout way possible, is the Tesla accelerates fast- sure. But so does a top fuel dragster, and neither is a sports car.

A sports car is a small, usually two seat, two door automobile designed for spirited performance and nimble handling. Sports cars may be spartan or luxurious but high maneuverability and minimum weight are requisite.

-- Wikipedia

(Notice it doesn't say a damn thing about horsepower)


That's surprising to me. I have always considered a sports car to have a bit of extra power. I guess I'll have to open my mind a bit.


I suppose that would be very difficult to define.

I think sports cars have a higher power-to-weight ratio typically, but again if this was a prerequisite for a sports car then older cars would lose their sports car status over time.

Alternatively, a cheap car intended to be sporty made by a low-end manufacturer could be disqualified from being a sports car because of higher-end manufacturers throwing off the curve.


They usually do, but extra power isn't what make them sports cars.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: