> He meant that they cannot by law, rather than cannot because they dont have access.
Really what he meant is that the NSA can't target their listening at you, but they certainly can listen to your calls accidentally or in a mission targeted at some other person or targeted at you if they don't know for a fact that you're a U.S. person, and once they do listen to your calls, they certainly can forward that information to any appropriate law enforcement agency to take action against you, and they certainly can use that information to get a warrant to legalize targeting you if need be.
So really what he meant is that yes, the NSA can listen to your calls, "legally", in almost all circumstances. By taking care not to initially link up phone numbers and names/addresses, they can maintain that they didn't know you were a U.S. person for as long as they need to.
If you didn't understand that from his use of the word "cannot", well, I guess that's just your poor listening skills at fault.
Really what he meant is that the NSA can't target their listening at you, but they certainly can listen to your calls accidentally or in a mission targeted at some other person or targeted at you if they don't know for a fact that you're a U.S. person, and once they do listen to your calls, they certainly can forward that information to any appropriate law enforcement agency to take action against you, and they certainly can use that information to get a warrant to legalize targeting you if need be.
So really what he meant is that yes, the NSA can listen to your calls, "legally", in almost all circumstances. By taking care not to initially link up phone numbers and names/addresses, they can maintain that they didn't know you were a U.S. person for as long as they need to.
If you didn't understand that from his use of the word "cannot", well, I guess that's just your poor listening skills at fault.